Skip to content

Service

EAM Quick Audit

A practical audit for HxGN EAM / Octave Attune EAM environments, formerly Infor EAM. For teams that need a clear view of what is blocking day-to-day use, the review follows work orders, master data, SQL/FlexSQL logic, reports, custom rules and interface handovers. You receive evidence-backed findings and a prioritised improvement backlog.

Your work package

What we agree before starting

Defined scope

One agreed EAM workflow, report or recurring bottleneck, examined with representative records and the people who use them.

How the result is accepted

The owner can trace each material finding to evidence, review the priorities and choose the next action. Unresolved questions remain explicit.

Production and ongoing support

This is a diagnosis and prioritised action plan. Configuration changes, implementation, production release and ongoing support are separately scoped.

Typical starting points

Concrete issues this work can handle

The service is useful when the issue is specific enough to inspect in real systems, reports, data samples or daily workflows.

Preventive work orders that do not match maintenance reality

I compare maintenance plans, generated orders and completion history with the work technicians actually perform. This exposes obsolete intervals, wrong triggers and recurring cancellations before they distort workload and compliance figures.

Reports where SQL logic and operational meaning have drifted apart

I trace important figures through joins, filters, status rules and calculated fields, then validate the result with report users. The goal is one agreed definition that can be tested against representative records.

Custom EAM rules that are useful but undocumented

I identify where each rule runs, which business decision it supports and what depends on it. Useful custom logic becomes documented, testable and safer to change instead of remaining tribal knowledge.

Interface issues that appear as EAM adoption problems

I follow representative records across EAM and connected systems to separate usability or training issues from mapping, timing and validation failures. That keeps the improvement focused on the real cause.

EAM dashboard and API-style operational system illustration

Scope and deliverables

Scope and tangible results

The scope stays close to the systems, data and workflows that affect day-to-day work. The deliverables are designed to support a clear next decision.

Scope

Work order logic and status flows
Asset and master data quality
Reports, SQL and FlexSQL logic
Interface handovers and operational friction

Deliverables

Findings linked to representative records and business rules
Prioritised data and process gaps
Improvement candidates with dependencies and open questions
Agreed next actions for the customer or delivery partner

How it works

How the engagement works

A defined sequence keeps the work focused. Representative examples and access to the right owners make the review faster and more reliable.

Steps

01

Review current processes, reports and data samples

02

Interview operational and technical owners

03

Trace the main bottlenecks across EAM, interfaces and office workflows

04

Deliver a clear improvement backlog ordered by operational and commercial impact

Fit and boundaries

Good fit and clear boundaries

A focused scope makes the work easier to evaluate, deliver and hand over.

Good fit

  • Teams unsure where to start
  • EAM environments with trusted but frustrating workarounds
  • Maintenance leaders who need a pragmatic technical view

Not included

  • Not a broad enterprise transformation assessment
  • Not a vendor selection study
  • Not a theoretical slide deck without operational examples

EAM boutique: from requirement to tested change

EAM expertise that carries through to delivery

One specialist connects process clarification, EAM configuration and technical implementation. You receive an agreed work package with tests, documented changes and a handover your team or partner can use.

Does this service fit your case?

Bring the current workflow or problem, a few representative examples and the business context. The first step is to decide what is worth changing, testing or leaving alone.